The French Election in a Nutshell

Disclaimer: I do not claim that this article is an unbiased professional analysis of the French election.  I am just another dilettante in politics, my qualification? I read the news.

Originally, this is just a gathering of information that happened in chat. I added a few links for reference and tried to clarify a few things. The first round of the French presidential election is over at the time of this writing, the second is yet to come.

Why I care, and why you should, too

The Presidential Election

  • The French are electing their president in a direct election. A second round is a given since there is usually no one candidate in the first round that gains a majority of the votes
  • The two with the most votes go on to round two (May 7)

Economic and social problems

As is usual in this age the problems are complex. France’s economy has been ailing for a while (although I’ve read at least one analysis that they may be poised for an upswing). Hardest hit are as usual those outside the few big cities. The divide between rich city dwellers and poor country dwellers has been growing for years now. What makes this worse is that France as a country and as a political system is centered very much on Paris: the city and the province. Most career politicians have been to one of a few elite universities and they are a political class unto themselves, swampier even – from what I understand – than DC. There have been numerous corruption scandals lately.

I won’t even get started on French immigrant politics and the “banlieus” as that is a quagmire I guess nobody really understands (if they did they might do something about it).

To make it ever more complicated France has suffered several major terrorist attacks in recent years: Charlie Hebdo, Nov 13, Nizza and those are just the major ones (there’s always more).

And when there are problems, and those in charge fail to solve them, voters tend to protest by either not voting or voting for those who haven’t been in charge. Since the centrist parties are both seen as proponents of the failing status quo …

Those who offer (easy?) solutions

Much like the US there are two big parties – Parti Socialiste (PS, center-left) and Les Republicains(LR, center-right) – and a bunch of smaller ones that used to not amount to much.

This has changed.

The current Presidente Hollande (PS) has apparently been doing a terrible job. He wasn’t even running for another term. One would expect then, that the conservative candidate from the LR is the next best bet: but Fillon has been in a big scandal about corruption and nepotism since January 2017 and I am personally surprised that he did not drop out of the running. This election marks the first that the LR candidate has not made the second round of the elections in modern France!

For years now an extreme right-wing populist party called the “Front National” (FN) has been on the rise. Even more so since Marine Le Pen the daughter of the founder kicked out her even more extremist father and led the party into a somewhat more moderate stance – that is still extreme right. The major difference between the FN and the tea party is that in France’s political system the FN is not part of Les Republicains but a separate party – which is a good thing because LR voters will not automatically vote for Le Pen in round two out of partisanship, and Fillon can back someone else now that he is out of the race. Btw Marine le Pen has her own scandal.

Election night

So now there was a situation in which both major parties have botched badly: one has a sitting but incompetent president and the other has a scandal-ridden candidate. With Brexit, Trump etc. the polling had been so horribly wrong that nobody knew what to expect. There were five more or less likely candidates:

  • Le Pen (FN) – everyone expected her to make round two. She has promised a Frexit referendum, wants to leave the Euro, push out immigrants, basically “France First”
  • Hamon (PS) – unlikely due to people having a terrible dislike for Hollande (approval ratings of 4% in november 2016)
  • Fillon (LR) – could have been, but the scandal …
  • Melenchon (La France Insoumise, another EU sceptic from the left-left) – if it was him and Le Pen in the final running … nothing good for the EU could come out of it and he was polling close enough to the rest to make this a real possibility
  • Macron (En Marche, not a party, a movement, openly pro-EU) – but he has never held elected office, has no party to back him … and he’s married to a woman who used to be his teacher (not that I care but some may and will)

So with Le Pen seemingly set to take one of the two top-spots, Hamon/the PS quite obviously not really in the running, there were three candidates for the remaining spot in round two.

  • Fillon – scandal ridden whose win promised “more of the same” and who would stand a good chance to actually loose to Le Pen in round two
  • Melenchon on the other end of the political spectrum from Le Pen but with much the same goals – if for different reasons
  • Macron looked like he he might convince more people to vote for him and who promises reform with and within the EU

So looking in from the outside, not able to do much but go march with #and tweet #(stay with us) there was about one third of a chance for a result that would postpone or even prevent loud calls for Frexit. That is the reason we were waiting with much dread for the first numbers at 8 pm last Sunday.

With Le Pen and Melenchon 40% of the voters voted for EU sceptics, a sad result for the EU and another pointer that we desperately need reforms for the EU. Fillon, Hamon and most others have promised to back Macron for the second round to prevent Le Pen but she might still win.

So now we’re hoping that once again 80% or more of the French will indeed vote and not follow yesterdays trending tag in France # (without me on may 7) and that they will vote for the pro-EU candidate.

My 2 Cents

The left is calling for boycott because “they will not elect the lesser of two evils” which is in my opinion an shortsighted and egotistical stance because one of them will get elected anyway.  Boycott gets the Trumps of this world elected and walls built.

Globalism is not always a good thing but it can’t be turned back.

Politicians who promise easy solutions, promise to extricate their country out of the international entanglements and call “My country first” are bad for everyone.

Personally I am for a stronger integration of the EU. “United in diversity” the EU Motto which we now need more than ever. And I’ll be marching again …

Categorized as rants

By Yashima

Writer of code and stories

1 comment

  1. Thank you for explaining a complicated, charged topic. For someone who doesn’t follow the news, this reads like a thriller novel, which is a bit scary since it’s real life

Comments are closed.